Skip to main content

OK, finally some useful information

If you buy books--and the odds are if you are reading this you buy too many--you need to stop shopping online at Amazon or Borders or Barnes & Noble.

Why? Because there is a better deal out there.

Check out Abebooks.com. "ABE" stands for Advanced Book Exchange, not an old bald guy in a dusty store. It is a consortium of several thousand online booksellers and several million titles (old and new) in a consolidated marketplace.

The search engine is powerful, and best of all the whole place is market-driven. You will usually find far more copies available in a range of conditions and prices than you do from Amazon, and Abebooks stands behind its transactions.

Often you can even scoop the bookstores; both Pat Buchanan's and Glenn Beck's new books were available here (sometimes in review copies or paperback advance proofs) several days before they went on sale in bookstores, and at cheaper prices.

You do have to watch postage charges carefully, but that's true everywhere.

Try this for reasonable prices on hard-to-find out-of-print titles as well. You won't go back.

Comments

Anonymous said…
By comparison with my hundreds of overwhelmingly positive experiences with Amazon and the thousands of online retailers who do business via Amazon (including getting a number of rare, hard to find, and out of print books, some for amazing prices like $0.01 (+ $3.49 shipping), so far I have made one purchase from AbeBooks.com and I have somewhat mixed feelings about it.

I bought an advanced engineering calculus textbook which all the companies I was familiar with listed for $140-160 + S&H from Abebooks for $36 + $7.50 shipping.

So why am I not absolutely delighted at getting my book for one fourth of the expected price?

I am, but the ABE bookseller I purchased it from, despite having an address in Iowa, shipped me a re-bound copy from India and this opened the door for our government to make my Abebooks experience miserable.

Despite the package having come from a nation we are on relatively good terms with, and being clearly labeled on the shipping manifest as a textbook (which could have been verified by x-ray or other non-invasive or at least non-destructive means) customs crudely cut the package open, resulting in minor damage to the cover, then poorly taped it back together, resulting in more damage when i opened it and sticky spots from the adhesive.

Then the Post Office decided to treat it as a registered letter and refuse to deliver unless I appeared in person showed ID and signed for it. So I took off from work, went and stood in line for 25 minutes, showed the guy at the counter my Postal Notice slip, he asked for ID so I also showed my Passport. Then he went into the back room for a while. I heard a conversation/argument in which am pretty sure I heard my name mentioned & something about needing to talk to an inspector. Then a woman came out and asked somewhat rudely if I had another form of ID. So I went out to the car, got my Driver's License and showed it to her. She went back into the back room. (Now by this time I had not only wasted almost an hour, I was seriously calculating my chances of getting to the exit all the way on the opposite side of the building in case the SS showed up to disappear me to Guantanamo Bay - they made me feel almost that comfortable about claiming my book.)

A few minutes later, the original guy came out with a package and tossed it across the counter at me w/o a word. This took me somewhat by surprise and i didn't quite catch it, resulting in a nice dent in one corner from hitting the floor. That kind of "service" is why I rent a private mailbox, so I can have as little contact with Postal workers as possible.

None of this is really Abebooks' fault, of course, but I still can't say I'm completely satisfied with that shopping experience.

I'll give them another chance, but I'll definitely be wary...

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?