Skip to main content

The Intellectual Poverty of Diversity (and other rants)

Friend Waldo Lydecker has a Monday Night Rant posted that covers a lot of ground (rants are good for that, if you can just get somebody to read them).

He takes on media--satellite radio and cable TV--for assuming that "the gay experience ends at about age 28 and after that you put on weight and wear sweaters that button up."

But more importantly for my current purpose, he tackles the conjoined issues of identity politics and cultural diversity, explaining that

Paradoxically ... we left Seattle- one of the gayest cities in America, [because] it was- is- too gay. People won't let you be your own kind of gay. You have to be on this team or that. If you aren't, punishments must be exacted. In our previous life as a lawyer, we lost a ton of work over a decade because we were- before the Bush regime made the position untenable- a Republican gay. We dealt with judges keen to seek the gay vote and then shiv them in court; newspapers who profess progressive views but who never effectively advocate for them, and legislators for whom tenure in office is the greatest gay contribution of all.

We, personally, prefer honest enemies to fair weather friends.


More generally, Waldo hits a critical nail right on the head:

Having reached the status of tribal elder, we have noted the transition of the rainbow tribe through many phases. And like other forms of identity politics- as we see in the time of the girl team v the black team for president- diversity isn't really lots of people who think different things. It's people who look different but all think the same thing. Like the caucus race in Alice in Wonderland, all must win, all must have a prize, but someone must win over everyone else. One identity must prevail.


Two other events made me bring this issue into clearer focus.

Liberal Geek of Delawareliberal has kindly placed Delaware Libertarian on his blogroll (a gesture I very much appreciate). My liberal friends there break their blog directory into Left, Middle, and Right--Libertarians, it seems, falling on the Right.

The Right, per se, does not upset me; The Colossus of Rhodey and Kilroy's Delaware are excellent company.

On the other hand, that Left-Middle-Right dichotomy makes less and less sense these days.

Here at Delaware Libertarian I have argued strenuously against single-payer health care, preferring market-driven solutions instead, I have opposed the Real ID program, and allowing competition rather than government regulation to resolve issues related to automobile production in India. On the other hand, regular readers of this blog also know I am a staunch advocate of gay rights, recognize the data-driven reality of global warming, and reject the idea of an aggressive, imperialist, or interventionist foreign policy.

Don't get me wrong: I don't want to be averaged out into the Middle, perpetual hang-out of those without a real opinion, but I have to wonder about political litmus tests and the true nature of diversity in modern-day America. Having rejected single-payer health insurance (which seems to be the defining issue for a lot of people here in Delaware), what would or could one do to be considered a liberal? Advocate for the marriage of prepubescent minors outside their species?

I'd better figure it out before the Web Ring Blogosphere of the Libertarian Left rules on my application.

Meanwhile, there's the discussion of teacher education programs that Hube started over at Colossus. [By the way, Hube lists this blog as belonging to the Middle.]

Wilmington University, Wesley College, Delaware State University and the University of Delaware all receive accreditation for their teacher education programs through NCATE--the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. NCATE places it highest stress on diversity, in fact censuring schools for "not seeking faculty from diverse cultural backgrounds to increase faculty diversity," and insisting that "Candidates interact in classroom settings on campus and in schools with professional education faculty, faculty in other units, and school faculty who represent diverse ethnic racial, gender, language, exceptionality, and religious groups."

So we have to have a lot of people who look different and serve different lunches on Ethnic Meal Day, BUT....

One of the key elements that suffuses the NCATE standards is that ALL course must be taught with COMPLETE CONSISTENCY as regards the NCATE-approved approach to cultural and educational diversity.

So our teacher-educators from Ghana, India, Peru, and West Virginia are all allowed to speak with different accents and wear traditional clothing, so long as they are all saying the same thing.

That intellectual fascists have redefined diversity from a free marketplace of ideas to identity politics is, at the same time, one of the greatest intellectual coups in American history and one of the greatest threats to Republican Democracy we have ever experienced. We have reached the place where ideas and individuals must be vetted by the appropriate constituency for ideological purity before they can be considered on their own merits.

And I still don't know if Libertarians have permission to be on the Right, the Left, or the Middle.

Frankly, I prefer to just be "out there."

Which is where you will find me most days.

Comments

“We have reached the place where ideas and individuals must be vetted by the appropriate constituency for ideological purity before they can be considered on their own merits.”

Fantastic observation, and one I think everything should really start thinking about in regards to their own way of thinking. I include myself in that. Dogma has overtaken common sense. A group’s official platform cannot be questioned. It’s all or nothing.

In no other aspect of our daily lives (except, in my case and probably many others, a fanatical devotion to the protection of my family) is anything “all or nothing”. Everything is an annoying and exasperating shade of grey.

I doubt if I could pass the litmus test for ANY political group or association.

I guess I’m “out there” with you. I can’t imagine better company.
On the off chance anyone goes to read the entire rant to which Mr Newton refers, you will get a dead link. Tuesday morning it just looked like martini-fueled crankiness. But Mr Newton pretty well summarizes the gist of the urge to whine.
Hube said…
Hiya Steve -- and thanks for the compliments. We listed you as "middle," BTW, b/c you do cover a gamut of topics that cross both right and left.

Also, we (well, I, at least) like to consider our (my) selves (self) as pretty much libertarian. Maybe that's why we're "excellent co." (which we greatly appreciate!).

And excellent points about ed. school accreditations. Ugh.

PS: Started your scifi yarn, but I'm a hard scifi guy. I'm not into fantasy-esque stuff. Sorry!
Waldo
Stop that, damnit! When you put it up it ought to stay up; I really like the part about turning 28 and zipping up and wearing sweaters....

Hube,
I actually have a hard SF story "Incident at Gliese 581c" coming in two weeks.
All is not lost. Thanks to Waldo's blog roll, I found there is "The Gay Curmudgeon".

Hooray ! We are becoming a curmudgeon movement !
Hube said…
Definitely look forward to that story, Steve!
Welcome, Shirley! Please do visit Waldo again. We lack any discernable principles at all.
Anonymous said…
How about a totally new category/party...

Freely Undeclared

Yes, that's what I think of the major parties most of the time. You support one for some issues, and the other for a few, and neither for a lot of issues.

Yes, I realize that would make it the FU Party, but I think it's past time for that sort of attitude.

We're not going to agree 100% on everything, but we ought to work together on what we do agree on, and come to some consensus on the rest.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?