Skip to main content

And now for something completely different in Presidential preference polling....

THIS is cool.

THIS is the Project Implicit Presidential Implicit Analysis Test, presented at Edge.

It's a Harvard study on your implicit, below-consciousness-level reactions to the four remaining Presidential candidates (Clinton, Huckabee, Obama, and McCain). You answer a set of demographic questions, then complete about ten minutes worth of fast-response exercises regarding your subliminal responses to the candidates.

I can't really explain the way it works, other than to say that you're given one key for "Good" terms and a candidate's photo and the another key for "Bad" terms and the photos of any other candidate. Then you go through this multiple times as fast as you can, with the "Good" candidate constantly changing. I'd guess that it is your pattern of mistakes, as you tend to select, say, Barack as Good even when you're not supposed to, or Hillary as bad when she's supposed to be Good, that gives them their material.

Once you finish that, you answer a few more questions and they rate out your responses to the candidates on a sliding scale.

What blew me away was that I could not discern myself any pattern in my hesitations or my mistakes, but the test rated me as responding, on a visceral level, to Obama, followed by McCain, followed by Clinton, with Huckabee bringing up the rear.

And in those terms--personal gut reaction, not policies or programs--that's exactly how I rate them right now.

Try it--it's worth the waste of ten minutes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici