Skip to main content

OK, I'm sick of politics for the moment--let' try some science

. . . because the news is really interesting.

This week, astronomers at the University of Colorado at Boulder announced that they've found about half of the infamous missing matter in the universe.

This is an old problem--at least as far as modern cosmology is concerned. If you add up all the observable matter in the visible universe (galaxies, stars, that kind of thing), you end up with only about 4% of the necessary matter required by the so-called Standard Model of Cosmology. This is baryonic matter, composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons.

This has led to all sorts of speculative creations and theories, including dark matter and dark energy, to account for the missing mass. The diagram at the side shows the current theoretical mix of baryonic matter, dark matter, and dark energy.




Dark matter (often theorized in the form of WIMPs--Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) and dark energy are pretty weird concepts, and lead to all sorts of mathematical hijinks to make all the equations balance.

Now, however, between the galaxies there seems to be a more prosaic answer:

Now, in an extensive search of the relatively recent, local universe, University of Colorado at Boulder astronomers said they have definitively found about half of the missing normal matter, called baryons, in the spaces between the galaxies. This important component of the universe is known as the intergalactic medium and it extends essentially throughout all of space, from just outside our Milky Way galaxy to the most distant regions of space observed by astronomers.

The questions "where have the local baryons gone, and what are their properties?" are being answered with greater certainty than ever before. "We think we are seeing the strands of a web-like structure that forms the backbone of the universe," said CU-Boulder Professor Mike Shull. "What we are confirming in detail is that intergalactic space, which intuitively might seem to be empty, is in fact the reservoir for most of the normal, baryonic matter in the universe."


How important is this discovery, if it pans out? Think about how it would change the pie chart above.

This is significant enough to lead to a potential rewriting of the now generally accepted inflationary theory of Alan Guth, which required the early universe to expand faster than the speed of light.

Of course, if you already know that the entire universe is only 10,000 years old, you probably won't be too excited about this discovery.

Comments

Delaware Watch said…
What ramifications does this have for the controversy about the eventual fate of the universe?

1. The universe will forever expand, never contract, and eventually all the lights will go out because gravitational forces are insufficient to make it contract.

2. There's plenty of matter and, ergo, gravitational forces (though we have a hard time seeing it) to make the universe contract, perhaps resulting in another Big Bang.

Any idea?
There doesn't seem to be any direct discussion of that yet. My initial read is that this observation doesn't change the amount of matter expected, just the type.

At the current point, the consensus is that we are still on the cusp in which the rate of expansion could fall on either side--eternal expansion or big crunch--with a bare majority holding that the value will ultimately turn out to favor expansion.
Delaware Watch said…
I'm holding out hope for the big crunch. I'd like to think there could be more cracks at conscious being.

Besides, expansion has us not going out w/ a (no pun intended) a big bang but w/ a flicker. Kind of an inglorious end for such a dramatic & (epic of all) epical voyage. But that's a poetic consideration obviously. Matter seems to be decidedly prosaic.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?